Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Important - opinions please regarding competitions.
#1
Posted 08 August 2009 - 06:55 PM
How do members (new and old) want to decide the winner of the competitions? On a personal level it doesn't matter to me but since I run the forum I feel that if we have competitions at all then the winner should be chosen by a method that the majority are happy with and preferably one that rewards the best entry.
We've always let forum members vote for the winner, which I felt was fair enough. People can vote for themselves and that's fine by me. Now here comes the problem (or not depending on your viewpoint). On a couple of instances we have had entrants asking fiends who are not forum members to sign up and vote for them. How do we feel about this? To try and deter this a little (and I might have been wrong to do so) I made it so that members had to have made at least one post before they can vote.
Is this a suitable solution or was there no problem there to start with? It's been brought to my attention that certain other forums regard the voting as "fishy" and that you have to make 10 posts before you can vote - this is not the case. The last thing I want is the integrity of this forum and those who take part in the competitions or those who post or vote to be brought into question.
Let me point out that the winner of the last competition won because they received the most votes and in my opinion was a deserving winner. If the members of any other user group thinks otherwise then they are wrong. There is also no suggestion that any other member has acted improperly. If at all the problem is my fault for allowing the rules to become clouded.
So basically it comes down to this, do we want the competitions to continue and if so what format do we want them to take and how do we want to conduct the vote? I'd appreciate any suggestions or comments, it doesn't matter to me at all if your views are different to mine, that's fine but we do need to have a system in place that everyone understands and also one that doesn't make any 'creative elements' question this boards integrity.
Thanks for your time.
John
#2
Posted 08 August 2009 - 10:23 PM
John_1Click, on 08 August 2009 - 06:55 PM, said:
How do members (new and old) want to decide the winner of the competitions? On a personal level it doesn't matter to me but since I run the forum I feel that if we have competitions at all then the winner should be chosen by a method that the majority are happy with and preferably one that rewards the best entry.
We've always let forum members vote for the winner, which I felt was fair enough. People can vote for themselves and that's fine by me. Now here comes the problem (or not depending on your viewpoint). On a couple of instances we have had entrants asking fiends who are not forum members to sign up and vote for them. How do we feel about this? To try and deter this a little (and I might have been wrong to do so) I made it so that members had to have made at least one post before they can vote.
Is this a suitable solution or was there no problem there to start with? It's been brought to my attention that certain other forums regard the voting as "fishy" and that you have to make 10 posts before you can vote - this is not the case. The last thing I want is the integrity of this forum and those who take part in the competitions or those who post or vote to be brought into question.
Let me point out that the winner of the last competition won because they received the most votes and in my opinion was a deserving winner. If the members of any other user group thinks otherwise then they are wrong. There is also no suggestion that any other member has acted improperly. If at all the problem is my fault for allowing the rules to become clouded.
So basically it comes down to this, do we want the competitions to continue and if so what format do we want them to take and how do we want to conduct the vote? I'd appreciate any suggestions or comments, it doesn't matter to me at all if your views are different to mine, that's fine but we do need to have a system in place that everyone understands and also one that doesn't make any 'creative elements' question this boards integrity.
Thanks for your time.
John
In my humble opinion, I feel there should not be a competition because I know people can and do get friends and family to vote for them and it would not be an honest vote .
#3
Posted 08 August 2009 - 10:36 PM
In the past I've participated in voting for friend's entries in other competitions.Had I known your forum had rules in place, I wouldn't have voted.
The integrity of the forum was never in question. The opinions stated by me were mine alone and not of the creative elements forum.
Chas
#5
Posted 08 August 2009 - 11:13 PM
Phil
#6
Posted 09 August 2009 - 01:21 AM
I am sorry I caused a problem, it was not my intention.
I wanted to add to my post, I know I said the rules should be stated in the voting post, in fact it should be posted in the thread for the months entries in the first post.
#7
Posted 09 August 2009 - 02:30 AM
John_1Click, on 08 August 2009 - 06:55 PM, said:
How do members (new and old) want to decide the winner of the competitions? On a personal level it doesn't matter to me but since I run the forum I feel that if we have competitions at all then the winner should be chosen by a method that the majority are happy with and preferably one that rewards the best entry.
We've always let forum members vote for the winner, which I felt was fair enough. People can vote for themselves and that's fine by me. Now here comes the problem (or not depending on your viewpoint). On a couple of instances we have had entrants asking fiends who are not forum members to sign up and vote for them. How do we feel about this? To try and deter this a little (and I might have been wrong to do so) I made it so that members had to have made at least one post before they can vote.
Is this a suitable solution or was there no problem there to start with? It's been brought to my attention that certain other forums regard the voting as "fishy" and that you have to make 10 posts before you can vote - this is not the case. The last thing I want is the integrity of this forum and those who take part in the competitions or those who post or vote to be brought into question.
Let me point out that the winner of the last competition won because they received the most votes and in my opinion was a deserving winner. If the members of any other user group thinks otherwise then they are wrong. There is also no suggestion that any other member has acted improperly. If at all the problem is my fault for allowing the rules to become clouded.
So basically it comes down to this, do we want the competitions to continue and if so what format do we want them to take and how do we want to conduct the vote? I'd appreciate any suggestions or comments, it doesn't matter to me at all if your views are different to mine, that's fine but we do need to have a system in place that everyone understands and also one that doesn't make any 'creative elements' question this boards integrity.
Thanks for your time.
John
John
The only suggestion I can come up with is that a panel of "admin"/"regular" contributors are selected to vote on the photos... But instead of singular votes to say "I like this best" the panel must judge each photo out of 10? and then the winner is the one with the highest number. Maybe start a chat/thread and offer reasons why you like this... might encourage more people to participate if they are getting direct feedback on their shots and post processing... improving their chances of winning more comps. similar to a camera club. Not only that, other people can get more information on how a shot was processed and gain more skills.
Those that are on the panel are allowed to place entries, and because each photo will have been judged, there shouldnt be a risk of someone voting for themselves to win... or if this doesnt suit, have a rotational panel so people can still place entries but are not put in a position where the voting could be bias?
This method removes the "temptation" to get friends to vote for them in order of winning a prize, its fair, but it takes dedication. But the overall results would far outway the minimal time it would take to judge the photos.
Just a suggestion, and I would be happy to contribute my time if this method is chosen.
#8
Posted 09 August 2009 - 10:05 AM
John_1Click, on 08 August 2009 - 06:55 PM, said:
How do members (new and old) want to decide the winner of the competitions? On a personal level it doesn't matter to me but since I run the forum I feel that if we have competitions at all then the winner should be chosen by a method that the majority are happy with and preferably one that rewards the best entry.
We've always let forum members vote for the winner, which I felt was fair enough. People can vote for themselves and that's fine by me. Now here comes the problem (or not depending on your viewpoint). On a couple of instances we have had entrants asking fiends who are not forum members to sign up and vote for them. How do we feel about this? To try and deter this a little (and I might have been wrong to do so) I made it so that members had to have made at least one post before they can vote.
Is this a suitable solution or was there no problem there to start with? It's been brought to my attention that certain other forums regard the voting as "fishy" and that you have to make 10 posts before you can vote - this is not the case. The last thing I want is the integrity of this forum and those who take part in the competitions or those who post or vote to be brought into question.
Let me point out that the winner of the last competition won because they received the most votes and in my opinion was a deserving winner. If the members of any other user group thinks otherwise then they are wrong. There is also no suggestion that any other member has acted improperly. If at all the problem is my fault for allowing the rules to become clouded.
So basically it comes down to this, do we want the competitions to continue and if so what format do we want them to take and how do we want to conduct the vote? I'd appreciate any suggestions or comments, it doesn't matter to me at all if your views are different to mine, that's fine but we do need to have a system in place that everyone understands and also one that doesn't make any 'creative elements' question this boards integrity.
Thanks for your time.
John
I quite like the idea of having a panel who would judge images and rate them from 1 to 10 as well as put their comments on each so that everyone can learn from each other and also it would then not be possible for anyone to “ask” friends to vote for them. I think that the winner this time deserved to win on merit as she didn’t have to try and influence the voting process and I congratulate her. It is a pity that one member’s actions should have spoiled the competition for the rest of the entrants. The competition is run for our benefit and it is up to us to be trustworthy competitors.
#10
Posted 09 August 2009 - 11:00 AM
fracrom, on 09 August 2009 - 10:42 AM, said:
Had a look at the site but can't see how the voting works.
Kat
#11
Posted 09 August 2009 - 12:57 PM
Number of posts can be avoided, by making posts. Length of membership (greater than x days / weeks) would possibly be a better restriction, but for the determined, all they have to do is plan in advance!
Personally I now don’t vote in comps where I have entered. For me there is no satisfaction in knowing my own vote tipped the balance to me, and it is very annoying when I find I lost by one vote to someone I voted for!
I like the idea of the competitions. It is good for the participants – encouraging creativity and progression, and learning from others. And it is good for the forum, generating interest, traffic and hopefully ultimately a bit more revenue for the owner!
Having a judge (or judges) to pick the winner may end up being a drain on running the comp, and is likely to be even more open to complaints! (how often do we disagree with judges?
If the forum software allows it I would prevent self voting and multiple voting (so only 1 vote per person) and possibly use length of membership and / or posts to restrict who can vote. A statement of the rules (whether software enforced or not) at the start of each competition post would be good encouragement to play fair.
#13
Posted 09 August 2009 - 01:26 PM
#14
Posted 10 August 2009 - 02:30 PM
I think the competition is a great tool and asset to your site. I think people like me who are new to Photoshop and Actions have a chance to see how people use PS to enhance their images.
My feelings are that "ONLY" members that have purchased the Actions should be able to vote.
Stuffing the ballot box by having people register and vote for them is not doing them any justice.
I don't know if the system can validate the user ID and check to see if they are a registered user of the actions.
After the voting the administrator and a senior panel of members ( 2to3 ) should review the entries to determine if the "creative side" of the image should be selected.
I know this is your forum and you have the last say, but I sincerely hope that you continue the competition.
Thanks,
Gerry Sharp
#15
Posted 10 August 2009 - 05:48 PM
The idea of a 'panel' of some sort is coming up quite often but the problem I have with this is how do we decide on the panel? I don't want to decide the winner myself as I think this would cause as many issues as it solves.
Having some further restriction on who can vote is possible and reasonable but the 'one post before you can vote rule' was already seen in some quarters as draconian.
I quite like the idea of having to have bought some 1-click products in the past as being a requirement to vote but I'll have to look into the practicalities of setting this up within the confines of the forum software - I want it as automated as possible. What I could look at is automatically registering customers as forum members when they place an order but this leaves the problem of existing members. If I can implement this in a reasonably easy manner then this is a possible option.
Keep the suggestions coming and thanks again for your comments.
John
#16
Posted 13 August 2009 - 04:18 PM
CJ
#17
Posted 23 August 2009 - 02:13 AM
A couple of suggestions.
1. Forum membership restricted to those who have purchased 1 Click Actions
2. Voting restricted to those who enter the competition only & you have to vote for somebody other than yourself
Regards
Steve
#18
Posted 23 August 2009 - 08:44 AM
dags, on 23 August 2009 - 02:13 AM, said:
A couple of suggestions.
1. Forum membership restricted to those who have purchased 1 Click Actions
2. Voting restricted to those who enter the competition only & you have to vote for somebody other than yourself
Regards
Steve
Thanks Steve (and everyone else) for your suggestions. I think that in some forums getting friends to vote goes on and is accepted as the norm but I think we need a system whereby everyone works to the same guidelines and as you say the best picture should win. Just to clarify on the last competition Charlee was a fair winner - she did nothing wrong whatsoever.
I've actually suggested voting for yourself on a couple of occasions as I know it happens and wanted no one to be disadvantaged by not doing so and also I didn't know how to prevent it
Restricting votes to 1clickactions customers has been suggested a few times now and I think this is the way to go. I think restricting those entitled to vote just to comptition entrants might be a little too restrictive.
So here's what I've decided:
The competition will continue as most people want them to.
Only forum members who are also customers will be entitled to vote.
Voting for yourself will be discouraged.
There'll be no competition this month as it'll take a while to set up the new member groups required to restrict voters, I'l also start a new thread with a clearer set of guidelines for the future.
Thanks again to everyone who made suggestions.
John
#19
Posted 24 August 2009 - 10:13 AM
John_1Click, on 23 August 2009 - 08:44 AM, said:
I've actually suggested voting for yourself on a couple of occasions as I know it happens and wanted no one to be disadvantaged by not doing so and also I didn't know how to prevent it
Restricting votes to 1clickactions customers has been suggested a few times now and I think this is the way to go. I think restricting those entitled to vote just to comptition entrants might be a little too restrictive.
So here's what I've decided:
The competition will continue as most people want them to.
Only forum members who are also customers will be entitled to vote.
Voting for yourself will be discouraged.
There'll be no competition this month as it'll take a while to set up the new member groups required to restrict voters, I'l also start a new thread with a clearer set of guidelines for the future.
Thanks again to everyone who made suggestions.
John
Well done John,
Agree with Charlee having the best Image. Well done to Charlee.
Keep up the great work John
Phil
#20
Posted 02 October 2009 - 04:56 PM
Once again thanks for your comments and patience.
John

Help
Add Reply

MultiQuote








